Notornis, 37 (2), 154-156
Article Type: book review
Notornis, 37 (2), 154-156
Article Type: book review
Notornis, 37 (2), 107-119
Article Type: paper
Four surveys for Kokako were conducted in the Hunua Range between November 1986 and May 1988, by playing tapes of the local song dialect. Three of the four surveys were done in conjunction with the Auckland and South Auckland branches of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Forty Kokako were recorded, of which 12 were definitely in pairs, one was a definite juvenile and another a possible juvenile. Some of the remaining 26 were likely to have been paired. Thirty-eight birds were recorded in tawa-podocarp forest and two in adjacent second-growth scrub. The 40 birds ranged in altitude between 300 and 660 m ad. with an average of 490 m. They were distributed in the following catchments: Mangatangi (20 birds), Mangatawi (12), Orere (5), Tapapakanga (2) and Hauarahi (1). Most records were of birds heard rather than seen, and tape responses were low compared with those in surveys elsewhere. Comparisons are made with past surveys and survey techniques, and the discussion includes options for forest management in the Hunua Range.Ecology Division, DSZR, c/- Bulk Water Department, ARC, Private Bag, Auckland
Notornis, 37 (3-4), 268-268
Article Type: Letter
Notornis, 37 (1), 25-26
Article Type: short note
Notornis, 37 (3-4), 157-160
Article Type: paper
The osteology of the New Zealand genera Mohoua and Finschia shows that they are definitely not referable to the Pachycephalinae or any other group within the corvine assemblage. This is in contrast to Sibley and Ahlquist’s original interpretation of their DNA-DNA hybridization studies and supports a recent reanalysis of that data by critics, who concluded that these genera belong among the “Passerida”. Within that group, the relationships of Finschia and Mohoua remain uncertain. No osteological basis could be found for continuing to separate the genus Finschia from Mohoua. The three species in the expanded genus Mohoua show increasing specialization for use of the hindlimb in foraging and in order of most primitive to most derived should be listed as M. novaeseelandiae, M. albicilla, and M. ochrocephala. The last two species are very distinct from one another osteologically and are not to be regarded as subspecies of a single species.
Notornis, 36 (2), 89-95
Article Type: Paper
Notornis, 36 (4), 280-284
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (2), 149-150
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (2), 114-116
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (1), 50-51
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (3), 189-190
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (2), 95
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (4), 284
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (2), 151-156
Article Type: Paper
Notornis, 36 (4), 1-3
Article Type: Index
Notornis, 36 (1), 51-52
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (3), 191-196
Article Type: Paper
Notornis, 36 (2), 96-98
Article Type: Short Note
Notornis, 36 (4), 285-298
Article Type: Paper
Notornis, 36 (2), 157-158
Article Type: Short Note